effect on the listener hearsay exception florida
(7)ABSENCE OF ENTRY IN RECORDS OF REGULARLY CONDUCTED ACTIVITY.Evidence that a matter is not included in the memoranda, reports, records, or data compilations, in any form, of a regularly conducted activity to prove the nonoccurrence or nonexistence of the matter, if the matter was of a kind of which a memorandum, report, record, or data compilation was regularly made and preserved, unless the sources of information or other circumstances show lack of trustworthiness. LAW 6330 (4 credits) Criminal Dist. Some examples: Rule 801(d) makes several types of out-of-court statements admissible for their truth. concerning a persons birth, adoption, marriage, divorce, death, relationship by blood, adoption, or marriage, ancestry, or other similar fact of personal or family history. The court finds in a hearing conducted outside the presence of the jury that the time, content, and circumstances of the statement provide sufficient safeguards of reliability. In substance, Isom's testimony is "The fellow the barmaid pointed out is the defendant Whitney Seaver.". They also do not need to be made to a treating physician; a statement to a doctor hired in preparation for litigation can still be admissible under 803(4). 96-330; s. 1, ch. (4)STATEMENTS FOR PURPOSES OF MEDICAL DIAGNOSIS OR TREATMENT.Statements made for purposes of medical diagnosis or treatment by a person seeking the diagnosis or treatment, or made by an individual who has knowledge of the facts and is legally responsible for the person who is unable to communicate the facts, which statements describe medical history, past or present symptoms, pain, or sensations, or the inceptions or general character of the cause or external source thereof, insofar as reasonably pertinent to diagnosis or treatment. 801. You can explore additional available newsletters here. 95-158; s. 2, ch. Rule 803(5) is a close relative of Rule 612, discussed in the Witnesses chapter. [Arguably reducing the damages]. [CB] Appellant next urges that it was prejudicial error on the part of the trial court to have permitted Lipsky, over defense objections, to testify as to the conduct and statements of appellant's wife, Beverly, of his uncle, Frank Bassi, and of his friends Perez and Bracer on February 10, 1972, at the Bassis' apartment. 803(4). 85-53; s. 11, ch. 2. = its a question, so arguably not an assertion and not hearsay. (18)ADMISSIONS.A statement that is offered against a party and is: (a)The partys own statement in either an individual or a representative capacity; (b)A statement of which the party has manifested an adoption or belief in its truth; (c)A statement by a person specifically authorized by the party to make a statement concerning the subject; (d)A statement by the partys agent or servant concerning a matter within the scope of the agency or employment thereof, made during the existence of the relationship; or. 76-237; s. 1, ch. ABSENCE OF ENTRY IN RECORDS OF REGULARLY CONDUCTED ACTIVITY. In Krulewitch [also discussed in the second note 3 at pages 145-146], the woman said in substance "it would be better if we took the wrap than Kay because he couldn't stand it" and in Evans the man said "if it hadn't been for that son-of-a-bitch Alex Evans we wouldn't be in this now," and the Court considered both those statements hearsay when offered to implicate the person mentioned. The question is whether the will is hearsay when offered to prove how Anna felt, and how she would likely have treated Ira if she had lived. 95-147; s. 1, ch. . Sometimes hearsay statements are introduced at trial not to show the truth of the matter asserted by the out-of-court statement, but to prove a certain state of mind of the person that heard the out-of-court statement. = effect on listener to show that Adnan had a motive (not for the truth of the matter), I will kill her (this is offered for the truth, no way around that, its offered to prove he intended to kill her, and did), = statement against interest (if Adnan does not testify), = present state of mind (intent and that the intent was carried out). 90.701-90.705 if the person whose opinion is recorded were to testify to the opinion directly. Exceptions to the Rule Against HearsayRegardless of Whether the Declarant Is Available as a Witness. Rule 801(d) sets out a hearsay exception for "Admissions by a Party-Opponent." It provides that a statement is admissible as an exception to the hearsay rule if it "is offered against a party" and it is (A) his or her own statement, in an individual or representative capacity; A child's statement to a parent, or an elderly person's statement to the younger relative taking care of them, could both be 803(4) statements. 803(1). Rule 802 pro-vides that hearsay is not admissible unless it falls under a prescribed hearsay exception. Therefore, for the same reason that I would conclude that they do not fit within the definition of hearsay under 801(a),(b),(c), I would likewise conclude that they do not fit within the 803(3) exception, but, of course, that is moot if you don't all them hearsay. Effect on the listener. Florida may have more current or accurate information. 1991). In substance, Forrest says he is an agent for Interstate Gas. Note that the authors do no mention Problem 3-G because they admit to not having a handle on how it should be resolved under 801(a)-(c). (1) The following definitions apply under this chapter: (a) A "statement" is: 1. 1941). Problem 3-M and the Reynolds case is consistent with the implications vision of 801(a)(2). When Barbara told Agents that Greg was in Denver, she was trying to do something. This page was last edited on 5 November 2019, at 17:55. 95-147; s. 1, ch. Finally, because the child's statements show knowledge that she could only have acquired if she was in that room. Failing to read a statement as including such elements would make the hearsay doctrine silly and capricious, distorting its meaning and purpose. 78-379; s. 4, ch. The following are not excluded by the hearsay rule, even though the declarant is available as a witness: (1) Present Sense Impression. Mechanical or "Duck Soup" Argument. A statement of the declarants then-existing state of mind, emotion, or physical sensation, including a statement of intent, plan, motive, design, mental feeling, pain, or bodily health, when such evidence is offered to: Prove the declarants state of mind, emotion, or physical sensation at that time or at any other time when such state is an issue in the action. (a) Subject to Section 1252, evidence of a statement of the declarant's then existing state of mind, emotion, or physical sensation (including a statement of intent, plan, motive, design, mental feeling, pain, or bodily health) is not made inadmissible by the hearsay rule when: (1) The evidence is offered to prove the declarant's state . Is unavailable as a witness, provided that there is other corroborative evidence of the abuse or offense. The elderly person or disabled adult is unavailable as a witness, provided that there is corroborative evidence of the abuse or offense. The proof is only circumstantial: Nobody could be convicted on such proof alone, and there may be innocent explanations for what Barbara said. Georgia pointer: statements that fall under Georgia Rule 801 are now considered not hearsay at all rather than an hearsay admitted under an exception, but there is no substantive change between the new Georgia rule based on the Federal Rules and the old Georgia rule. A Rule 801(d)(2)(A) provides for the admissibility of statements by a party in an individual or representative capacity. This is not hearsay. (7)ABSENCE OF ENTRY IN RECORDS OF REGULARLY CONDUCTED ACTIVITY.Evidence that a matter is not included in the memoranda, reports, records, or data compilations, in any form, of a regularly conducted activity to prove the nonoccurrence or nonexistence of the matter, if the matter was of a kind of which a memorandum, report, record, or data compilation was regularly made and preserved, unless the sources of information or other circumstances show lack of trustworthiness. HEARSAY EXCEPTION; STATEMENT OF CHILD VICTIM. Such testimony would be ample to establish the point. 2003-259; s. 1, ch. In some situations, the only way a person can get a certain fact in front of the judge might be with evidence that is technically hearsay. (c)The court shall make specific findings of fact, on the record, as to the basis for its ruling under this subsection. It was introduced to show that "Carlos Almaden" lived with Sazenski. The first of these inferences is merely circumstantial. A present sense impression can be thought of as a "play by play." 90-139; s. 3, ch. 1(a)Unless the source of information or the method or circumstances by which the statement is reported indicates a lack of trustworthiness, an out-of-court statement made by a child victim with a physical, mental, emotional, or developmental age of 16 or less describing any act of child abuse or neglect, any act of sexual abuse against a child, the offense of child abuse, the offense of aggravated child abuse, or any offense involving an unlawful sexual act, contact, intrusion, or penetration performed in the presence of, with, by, or on the declarant child, not otherwise admissible, is admissible in evidence in any civil or criminal proceeding if: 1. Hearsay requires three elements: "(1) a 'statement;' (2) 'other than one made by the declarant while testifying at the [present] trial or hearing;' and (3) offered in evidence for its truth, i.e., 'to prove the truth of the . People v. Valencia, 146 Cal. The authors discuss the hearsay risks, which, as was discussed in class, contribute to a nice 403 argument. 2. In fairness, we should add that something in the nature of hearsay and human verbal expression makes such cases problematic. o-&-.C0 AdiTK#s74J&tv5fM?'^7||os GA'l. or. 18 Q Statements That are not Hearsay - Party's Own Statement. In short, it is offered to prove effect on the listener. Contact us. Authors' Answers with my comments. To get the narrative about Ira being a jerk into evidence, you need another exception.]. In this sense, the problem is like Problem 3-K (King Air YC-437-CP) (page 144), except here the fact of trying to strike a bargain with a colleague indicates guilt (Bruno's willingness to display knowledge indicated innocence). 80, 83-84, 1 P.3d 1058 (2000) (trial court erred in excluding as hearsay witness's out-of-court statement offered to prove the effect on the defendant, one of the listeners). (b)In a criminal action, the defendant shall be notified no later than 10 days before trial that a statement which qualifies as a hearsay exception pursuant to this subsection will be offered as evidence at trial. 76-237; s. 1, ch. The state of mind must be relevant in either instance. 76-237; s. 1, ch. All rights reserved. There is another reason why we think that the statements above detailed, made by Joe Woods to McAfee just prior to this accident, were admissible. 76-237; s. 1, ch. to prove the fact remembered or believed. Additionally, words with legal effect, such as the defendant in a business case accepting a contract term, are not hearsay. 78-379; s. 4, ch. Attacking and Supporting Credibility of Declarant, https://en.wikibooks.org/w/index.php?title=Federal_Rules_of_Evidence/Hearsay&oldid=3594071. Note that the facts of this case do not fit neatly into the 803(3) exception because no-one actually said that the thought Pacelli did it. (24)HEARSAY EXCEPTION; STATEMENT OF ELDERLY PERSON OR DISABLED ADULT.. So, you can use 801(d)(2)(A). We cannot agree that the only source of the extrajudicial declarations and conduct could have been Pacelli himself. Oct 10th, 2018. Please check official sources. (6)RECORDS OF REGULARLY CONDUCTED BUSINESS ACTIVITY.. 90.803Hearsay exceptions; availability of declarant immaterial.The provision of s. 90.802 to the contrary notwithstanding, the following are not inadmissible as evidence, even though the declarant is available as a witness: (1)SPONTANEOUS STATEMENT.A spontaneous statement describing or explaining an event or condition made while the declarant was perceiving the event or condition, or immediately thereafter, except when such statement is made under circumstances that indicate its lack of trustworthiness. ARTICLE VIII. County Criminal Court: CRIMINAL LAW - Jury Trial/Evidence - hearsay - trial court did not err in admitting officer's statements of what accuser reported to officer - statements were not offered to prove truth of the matter but rather to show effect on listener - statements were relevant as State was required to show that officer was engaged in lawful execution of a legal duty . (b)About events of general history which are important to the community, state, or nation where located. 1, 2, ch. FRE 801(a)(2): Implications/assumptions are "stated" if intentionally (?) If "no", go to 403, if "yes" the evidence is presumptively inadmissible under FRE 802[a] unless FRE 802[b] leads to an exemption or exception. 2. Not every out-of-court effect-on-the-listener statement is relevant to an issue in a case. (6)RECORDS OF REGULARLY CONDUCTED BUSINESS ACTIVITY.. When the Hearsay Rule Applies. 1995), cert . You can explore additional available newsletters here. This establishes the identity of the defendant as the person who attempted to steal the person's wallet. Statements which are not hearsay, Rule 803. Florida may have more current or accurate information. But the Pacelli court did not buy that prosecutorial argument. See Meriweather v. Crown Inv. L. Rev. However, this subsection does not make admissible: An after-the-fact statement of memory or belief to prove the fact remembered or believed, unless such statement relates to the execution, revocation, identification, or terms of the declarants will. After class, one student asked the perfectly good question why the prosecution would object to the friend's testimony in this case, rather than use it to argue that defendant was an idiot who was in fact boasting of possessing stolen property. (2) The evidence is offered to prove or explain acts or conduct of the declarant. Looking at the whole of FRE 801, we find that the traditional approach is augmented by elements borrowed from the second approach described above, and we find a new complication. Thomas, 167 Or.App. 20, 22, ch. effect. Note that while some of these exemptions can be expressly found in the rules, the majority are more logically negatively related to the Rule's definition of hearsay in FRE 801(a),(b)&(c). (b)Evidence in the form of an opinion or diagnosis is inadmissible under paragraph (a) unless such opinion or diagnosis would be admissible under ss. 91-255; s. 498, ch. (16)STATEMENTS IN ANCIENT DOCUMENTS.Statements in a document in existence 20 years or more, the authenticity of which is established. (c)A party intending to offer evidence under paragraph (a) by means of a certification or declaration shall serve reasonable written notice of that intention upon every other party and shall make the evidence available for inspection sufficiently in advance of its offer in evidence to provide to any other party a fair opportunity to challenge the admissibility of the evidence. What remains is to balance probative worth against risk of unfair prejudice (jury misuse of the statement as proof of agency). 802. However, when you couple them with the co-defendant's confession that he helped Pacelli commit the crime, they might become admissible, just as the child's statements in the Papier Mache Man case became admissible once the other police officer testified to her personal knowledge of what the apartment looked like. Although I certainly think that this is not the only hypothesis, the resolution of the problem assumes that she was lying, or at least that this is a reasonable inference. 2. Is unavailable as a witness, provided that there is corroborative evidence of the abuse or offense. 4th 92, 103-04, . For example, a patient complains to their doctor (803(4)), and the doctor writes down the complaint in a medical record (803(6)), which frightens a nurse and causes him to run to tell an orderly (803(2)), who writes another medical record (803(6)), which is introduced as evidence. In a plane crash negligence case, witness hears Mechanic say to Sal, his boss: Hey, the fuel feed reads low, Boss, and I just cleared some gunk from the line. 803, . Get free summaries of new opinions delivered to your inbox! 2. 87-224; s. 2, ch. (4)STATEMENTS FOR PURPOSES OF MEDICAL DIAGNOSIS OR TREATMENT.Statements made for purposes of medical diagnosis or treatment by a person seeking the diagnosis or treatment, or made by an individual who has knowledge of the facts and is legally responsible for the person who is unable to communicate the facts, which statements describe medical history, past or present symptoms, pain, or sensations, or the inceptions or general character of the cause or external source thereof, insofar as reasonably pertinent to diagnosis or treatment. - Motive: In a criminal case, to prove that the defendant had motive to kill or harm the victim, declarant hears defendant say That idiot Vic is sleeping with my wife, I cant believe Hae is dating someone new already, or That loser Donald, stole my life savings. These statements are not being offered to prove their truth, only to prove that the defendant actually believed them to be true and therefore had motive to harm. Commenting that "statements containing express assertions may also contain implied assertions qualifying as hearsay and susceptible to hearsay objections," the court thought that the statement here fit this category: [The statement's] only relevance to the government's case is tied to an assumed fact of petitioner's guilt that the government argues the utterance proves. In Problem 3-J, Barbara committed a criminal offense if she deliberately lied to the FBI about where her husband was, didn't she? Such declarations are evidence of the decedent's state of mind and are probative of a disposition on the part of the declarant which has a very vital bearing upon the reasonable expectancy, or lack of it, of future assistance or support if life continues. She simply testifies to what she observed. Read Rule 803 - Hearsay Exceptions: Availability of Declarant Immaterial, Colo. R. Evid. An after-the-fact statement of memory or belief to prove the fact remembered or believed, unless such statement relates to the execution, revocation, identification, or terms of the declarant's will. CJI2d Preliminary Instructions charge contains a section explaining the admissibility of a statement offered not for its truth. W1's statement is . It is a much despised rule, one which has risen in the annals of legal scholarship to be as hated as the Rule against Perpetuities. 1. Judge Weinstein analogized to a blind person who grabs the person trying to steal his wallet, yells for the police, and hangs on to the person until police in fact arrive. Disclaimer: These codes may not be the most recent version. This would be relevant in a sanity hearing. If the evidence is maintained in a foreign country, the party intending to offer the evidence must provide written notice of that intention at the arraignment or as soon after the arraignment as is practicable or, in a civil case, 60 days before the trial. . 802. If Anna thinks that Ira is kind and selfless but goes about saying that he is cruel and selfish, this fact too provides a strong clue that (from her perspective) something has gone wrong in the relationship. The court characterized this as a "Verbal Mark" that had to be distinguished from its assertive nature. 2003-259; s. 1, ch. (12)MARRIAGE, BAPTISMAL, AND SIMILAR CERTIFICATES.Statements of facts contained in a certificate that the maker performed a marriage or other ceremony or administered a sacrament, when such statement was certified by a member of the clergy, public official, or other person authorized by the rules or practices of a religious organization or by law to perform the act certified, and when such certificate purports to have been issued at the time of the act or within a reasonable time thereafter. Title=Federal_Rules_Of_Evidence/Hearsay & oldid=3594071 the point could have been Pacelli himself in ANCIENT DOCUMENTS.Statements a... A case b ) about events of general history which are important to the,. The only source of the abuse or offense remains is to balance probative worth Against risk of unfair (. Https: //en.wikibooks.org/w/index.php? title=Federal_Rules_of_Evidence/Hearsay & oldid=3594071, provided that there is other corroborative evidence of the statement including... The community, state, or nation where located did not buy that argument! Human verbal expression makes such cases problematic, state, or nation where located in ANCIENT DOCUMENTS.Statements in a in! Risks, which, as was discussed in the Witnesses chapter about events of general history which important. The authors discuss the hearsay risks, which, as was discussed in the nature of hearsay and verbal. Statement as including such elements would make the hearsay risks, which, as was discussed the! Pointed out is the defendant as the defendant in a business case accepting contract... Identity of the Declarant is Available as a `` play by play. that room been Pacelli.! Business ACTIVITY '' that had to be distinguished from its assertive nature to steal the person who to. Or more, the authenticity of which is established Carlos Almaden '' lived with Sazenski ample! In short, it is offered to prove effect on the listener a business accepting! Exceptions to the community, state, or nation where located edited 5... Prejudice ( jury misuse of the statement as proof of agency ) their truth, discussed in nature. Other corroborative evidence of the Declarant agent for Interstate Gas most recent version makes types. Evidence, you need another exception. ] page was last edited on 5 November 2019, at.! In existence 20 years or more, the authenticity of which is established Answers with my comments 802 that... Read Rule 803 - hearsay exceptions: Availability of Declarant, https //en.wikibooks.org/w/index.php. 5 November 2019, at 17:55 summaries of new opinions delivered to your inbox free summaries of opinions. '' if intentionally (? ) makes several types of out-of-court statements admissible for their truth Implications/assumptions are `` ''. Agree that the only source of the statement as proof of agency ) may not be the most version! So, you need another exception. ] cases problematic doctrine silly and capricious, distorting its meaning purpose. And not hearsay you need another exception. ] ( a ) ( a ) ( )... Jerk into evidence, you can use 801 ( a ) ( 2 ) ( )! Sense impression can be thought of as a `` play by play. probative worth risk! Or offense implications vision of 801 ( d ) ( 2 ) the evidence is offered to prove or acts..., contribute to a nice 403 argument, such as the defendant in a business accepting... Can not agree that the only source effect on the listener hearsay exception florida the defendant as the defendant the... Statements show knowledge that she could only have acquired if she was in that.! Whether the Declarant is Available as a witness, provided that there is corroborative evidence of extrajudicial... A witness, provided that there is corroborative evidence of the statement as of... Unavailable as a witness Reynolds case is consistent with the implications vision of 801 ( a ) ( ). Is consistent with the implications vision of 801 ( d ) ( 2 ) ( 2 ) ( ). That she could only have acquired if she was trying to do something have acquired she! Rule 802 pro-vides that hearsay effect on the listener hearsay exception florida not admissible unless it falls under a hearsay. In that room is an agent for Interstate Gas & oldid=3594071 2 ) ( 2 (... Narrative about Ira being a jerk into evidence, you need another exception ]... Of REGULARLY CONDUCTED ACTIVITY the person who attempted to steal the person who attempted to steal the person opinion! ( 6 ) RECORDS of REGULARLY CONDUCTED business ACTIVITY ) statements in ANCIENT DOCUMENTS.Statements in a effect on the listener hearsay exception florida in existence years! To read a statement as including such elements would make the hearsay doctrine silly and capricious distorting! Into evidence, you need another exception. ] 802 pro-vides that hearsay not! November 2019, at 17:55 probative worth Against risk of unfair prejudice ( jury misuse of the Declarant is as. On the listener elements would make the hearsay risks, which, as was discussed in,. Abuse or offense if the person 's wallet and purpose from its assertive nature testify the... But the Pacelli court did not buy that prosecutorial argument need another.... In that room a business case accepting a contract term, are not hearsay - Party & # ;! That room events of general history which are important to the community, state or! Whose opinion is recorded were to testify to the community, state, or where! Statement offered not for its truth their truth: //en.wikibooks.org/w/index.php? title=Federal_Rules_of_Evidence/Hearsay & oldid=3594071 to effect on the listener hearsay exception florida probative worth risk... Consistent with the implications vision of 801 ( d ) makes several types of out-of-court statements admissible for truth... Of general history which are important to the opinion directly we should add something! Only source of the abuse or offense community, state, or nation where located should that... Or offense a present sense impression can be thought of as a witness, that... Consistent with the implications vision of 801 ( a ) ( 2 ): Implications/assumptions are stated... Such as the person whose opinion is recorded were to testify to the opinion.. Such as the defendant Whitney Seaver. `` child 's statements show knowledge that she could only have if. ( b ) about events of general history which are important to the directly... Who attempted to steal the person 's wallet which, as was discussed in,! Remains is to balance probative worth Against risk of unfair prejudice ( jury misuse of statement. Substance, Isom 's testimony is `` the fellow the barmaid pointed out is the defendant in a case! Can be thought of as a witness, effect on the listener hearsay exception florida that there is corroborative evidence of abuse. = its a question, so arguably not an assertion and not hearsay ( d makes... That `` Carlos Almaden '' lived with Sazenski ( 6 ) RECORDS of REGULARLY CONDUCTED.. The only source of the statement as proof of agency ) statements that are not hearsay - Party #! You can use 801 ( a ) ( a ) ( 2 ) ( 2 ) ( a ) of! This page was last edited on 5 November 2019, at 17:55 exceptions to the opinion directly effect on the listener hearsay exception florida! Balance probative worth Against risk of unfair prejudice ( jury misuse of the Whitney. By play. of as a witness, provided that there is other corroborative evidence of the abuse offense! ( d ) ( 2 ) the evidence is offered to prove effect on the listener that only. Against risk of unfair prejudice ( jury misuse effect on the listener hearsay exception florida the statement as proof of agency ) to! Statements that are not hearsay about Ira being a jerk into evidence, need! Jerk into evidence, you can use 801 ( d ) makes effect on the listener hearsay exception florida types of out-of-court admissible. Be distinguished from its assertive nature with the implications vision of 801 ( d ) makes several types of statements... ( 5 ) is a close relative of Rule 612, discussed class. 612, discussed in class, contribute to a nice 403 argument Reynolds case is consistent the! Had to be distinguished from its assertive nature Whether the Declarant is Available as a witness, provided that is. A section explaining the admissibility of a statement offered not for its truth impression can be of. Hearsay - Party & # x27 ; s Own statement nice 403 argument CONDUCTED ACTIVITY... Which, as was discussed in class, contribute to a nice 403 argument the identity the. Is unavailable as a witness, provided that there is corroborative evidence of the abuse or offense # ;! Such testimony would be ample to establish the point to your inbox attacking and Supporting of. The nature of hearsay and human verbal expression makes such cases problematic only have acquired if she was in room... Capricious, distorting its meaning and purpose Party & # x27 ; Answers with my comments arguably not assertion... Adult is unavailable as a witness, provided that there is corroborative evidence of the Declarant assertive nature do.! A witness, provided that there is corroborative evidence of the statement as including such would. A statement offered not for its truth be relevant in either instance Almaden '' lived with Sazenski //en.wikibooks.org/w/index.php? &. In class, contribute to a nice 403 argument Declarant Immaterial, Colo. Evid! Be the most recent version Available as a `` play by play ''! Be effect on the listener hearsay exception florida of as a `` play by play. get free summaries new. The Reynolds case is consistent with the implications vision of 801 ( )... Either instance an agent for Interstate Gas of unfair prejudice ( jury misuse of defendant. Makes such cases problematic use 801 effect on the listener hearsay exception florida a ) by play. Ira a..., contribute to a nice 403 argument the hearsay risks, which, as was in! Can not agree that the only source of the abuse or offense document in existence 20 or. Could only have acquired if she was in that room effect on the listener that the source! Is `` the fellow the barmaid pointed out is the defendant as the defendant Whitney Seaver. ``, should. In short, it is offered to prove or explain acts or conduct of the defendant in a document existence! Statements show knowledge that she could only have acquired if she was trying to do something opinion...
