swedish match ab v secretary of state for health
Judgement for the case Swedish Match AB and Swedish Match UK Ltd) v Secretary of State for Health Another directive made under art.95, addressed to Sweden, Austria and a couple of other countries, was created to limit tobacco advertising. By reason of both the considerable potential for growth in the market for tobacco products for oral use, confirmed by the manufacturers themselves of those products, and the introduction of smoke-free environments, those products are especially liable to encourage people who are not yet consumers of tobacco products, in particular young people, to become consumers. Jobs People Learning Dismiss Dismiss. Dismiss. In that context, it remains likely that Member States may be led to adopt various laws, regulations and administrative provisions designed to bring to an end the expansion in the consumption of tobacco products for oral use. The Queen on the Application of Swedish Match AB, et al. Lady Hale, Lord Kerr, Lord Wilson, Lord Reed, Lord Hughes. In particular, the Commission examined the possibility of lifting the prohibition on placing on the market tobacco products for oral use in the light of new scientific studies as to the harmfulness of those products to health and evidence of tobacco product consumption practices in the countries which permit the marketing of tobacco products for oral use. Article24(3) of Directive 2014/40 therefore concerns an aspect which is not covered by the harmonisation measures in that directive (judgment of 4May 2016, Philip Morris Brands and Others, C547/14, EU:C:2016:325, paragraph90). C-210/03 - Swedish Match. 19) In those circumstances, the High Court of Justice of England and Wales, Queens Bench Division (Administrative Court) (United Kingdom), decided to stay the proceedings and to refer the following question to the Court for a preliminary ruling: Are [Article 1(c) and Article 17] of Directive [2014/40] invalid by reason of: i. breach of the EU general principle of non-discrimination; ii. Case C-151/17, Swedish Match AB v Secretary of State for Health, ECLI:EU: C:2018:938 The prohibition on the placing on the market of tobacco for oral use is not in breach of the EU general principles of non-discrimination, proportionality and subsidiarity, of Articles 296, 34 and 35 TFEU and of Articles 1, 7 and 35 of the Charter. Since these proceedings are, for the parties to the main proceedings, a step in the action pending before the national court, the decision on costs is a matter for that court. breach of [the second paragraph of Article 296 TFEU]; v. breach of Articles 34 and 35 TFEU; and, vi. Subject to the principle of proportionality, limitations may be made only if they are necessary and genuinely meet objectives of general interest recognised by the Union or the need to protect the rights and freedoms of others. Consequently, that provision cannot, per se, demonstrate that the objectives of that directive could be adequately achieved by the Member States. Fundamental rights define minimum standards to ensure everyone is treated with dignity. It is also settled case-law that the extent of the requirement to state reasons depends on the nature of the measure in question and that, in the case of measures intended to have general application, the statement of reasons may be limited to indicating the general situation which led to its adoption, on the one hand, and the general objectives which it is intended to achieve, on the other. Moreover, tobacco products for oral use are particularly dangerous for minors because of the fact that their consumption is hardly noticeable. The validity of Article1(c) and Article17 of Directive2014/40 having regard to Articles1, 7 and35 of the Charter. C-151/17 ECLI:EU:C:2018:938 62017CJ0151. It operates through the following segments: Snus and Moist Snuff; Other Tobacco Products; Lights; and Other Operations. Moreover, the Commission also stated that a decision to lift the prohibition on placing on the market tobacco products for oral use would affect the policies for controlling the consumption of tobacco products by encouraging people who are not yet consumers of tobacco products, in particular young people, to become consumers and, therefore, such a decision would entail certain public health risks. Mire ejemplos de health state traduccin en oraciones, escuche la pronunciacin y aprenda gramtica. Dismiss . . ( On those grounds, the Court (First Chamber) hereby rules: Consideration of the question referred has disclosed nothing capable of affecting the validity of Article 1(c) and Article 17 of Directive 2014/40/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 April 2014 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States concerning the manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco and related products and repealing Directive 2001/37/EC. Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 14 December 2004. Consequently, and as stated by the Advocate General in point75 of his Opinion, taking into consideration when they were placed on the market, the effects of novel tobacco products on public health could not, by definition, be observed or studied at the time when Directive 2014/40 was adopted, whereas the effects of tobacco products for oral use were, at that time, sufficiently identified and substantiated scientifically. Minister zdrowia by czowiekiem sfrustrowanym. Article151 of the Act of Accession of Austria, Finland and Sweden [the Act concerning the conditions of accession of the Republic of Austria, the Republic of Finland and the Kingdom of Sweden and the adjustments to the Treaties on which the European Union is founded (OJ 1994 C241, p.21, and OJ 1995 L1, p.1] grants Sweden a derogation from the prohibition. Beklagter in diesem Verfahren ist der Secretary of State for Health (Minister fr Gesundheit, Vereinigtes Knigreich). ** I. 4 - Prohibition of torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, 9 - Right to marry and right to found a family, 10 - Freedom of thought, conscience and religion, 11 - Freedom of expression and information, 12 - Freedom of assembly and of association, 15 - Freedom to choose an occupation and right to engage in work, 19 - Protection in the event of removal, expulsion or extradition, 22 - Cultural, religious and linguistic diversity, 26 - Integration of persons with disabilities, 27 - Workers' right to information and consultation within the undertaking, 28 - Right of collective bargaining and action, 29 - Right of access to placement services, 30 - Protection in the event of unjustified dismissal, 32 - Prohibition of child labour and protection of young people at work, 34 - Social security and social assistance, 36 - Access to services of general economic interest, 39 - Right to vote and to stand as a candidate at elections to the European Parliament, 40 - Right to vote and to stand as a candidate at municipal elections, 45 - Freedom of movement and of residence, 47 - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial, 48 - Presumption of innocence and right of defence, 49 - Principles of legality and proportionality of criminal offences and penalties, 50 - Right not to be tried or punished twice in criminal proceedings for the same criminal offence, EU Fundamental Rights Information System - EFRIS, Promising practices: equality data collection, Civil society and the Fundamental Rights Platform, NHRIs, Equality Bodies and Ombudsperson Institutions, UN, OSCE and other international organisations, From institutions to community living for persons with disabilities: perspectives from the ground, Second European Union Minorities and Discrimination Survey Main results, Second European Union Minorities and Discrimination Survey (EU-MIDIS II) Muslims, Together in the EU: Promoting the participation of migrants and their descendants, Second European Union Minorities and Discrimination Survey (EU-MIDIS II) Roma, Child-friendly justice perspectives and experiences of professionals: Press pack, Jewish peoples experiences and perceptions of hate crime, discrimination and antisemitism, Child-friendly justice perspectives and experiences of children, Paragraphs referring to EU Charter (original language), Justice, victims rights and judicial cooperation. For Dryft: David Bloch and Colin Fraser of Greenberg Traurig For Swedish Match: not . A violation of property rights, sometimes in the form of an expropriation or a taking by the government. List of documents. Swedish Match AB v Secretary of State for Health, intervener: New Nicotine Alliance (Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court) (United Kingdom)) (Reference for a preliminary ruling Approximation of laws Manufacture, presentation and sale of Costs incurred in submitting observations to the Court, other than the costs of those parties, are not recoverable. Subject to the principle of proportionality, limitations may be made only if they are necessary and genuinely meet objectives of general interest recognised by the Union or the need to protect the rights and freedoms of others. [68] The matches are manufactured according to the European match standards EN 1783:1997. Article19(1) of Directive 2014/40, headed Notification of novel tobacco products reads as follows: Member States shall require manufacturers and importers of novel tobacco products to submit a notification to the competent authorities of Member States of any such product they intend to place on the national market concerned. Swedish Match AB v Secretary of State for Health, intervener: New Nicotine Alliance (Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Queen's Bench . Il Ministro della sanit convenuto nell'ambito di tale procedimento. Snus forms part, together with other tobacco harm reduction products, already available in the United Kingdom, of a coherent tobacco harm reduction strategy. breach of the EU general principle of proportionality; iii. The Snus and Moist Snuff segment produces and markets smokeless cigarettes. Delivered in open court in Luxembourg on 22November 2018. . It is apparent from the order for reference that Swedish Match claims that Article1(c) and Article17 of Directive 2014/40 are contrary to Articles34 and35 TFEU on the ground that those provisions are in breach of the principles of equal treatment and proportionality and of the obligation to state reasons. In those circumstances, Article1(c) and Article17 of Directive 2014/40 are not in breach of the principle of equal treatment. In that regard, Article52(1) of the Charter provides that any limitation on the exercise of the rights and freedoms recognised by the Charter must be provided for by law and must respect the essence of those rights and freedoms. Swedish Match I: Case C-210/03, R (Swedish Match AB) v Secretary of State for Health ( "Swedish Match I") EU:C:2004:802 was a challenge to Directive 2001/37/EC, which prohibited the sale of oral tobacco in UK, couldn't buy or sell unless it's Sweden. 4 . Sehen Sie sich Beispiele fr state of health-bersetzungen in Stzen an, hren Sie sich die Aussprache an und lernen Sie Grammatik. It follows from the foregoing that those provisions do not involve restrictions that are disproportionate to the twofold objective pursued by Directive 2014/40, namely to facilitate the smooth functioning of the internal market in tobacco and related products and to ensure a high level of protection of public health. On May 11, 2022, Philip Morris Holland Holdings B.V. ("PMHH"), an affiliate of Philip Morris International Inc. ("PMI"), announced a recommended public offer to the shareholders of Swedish Match to tender all shares in Swedish Match to PMHH (the "Offer"). 2023 Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids|Trademarks|Copyright|Privacy. The referring court seeks to ascertain whether Directive 2014/40 is in breach of the principle of equal treatment in that it prohibits the placing on the market of tobacco products for oral use while permitting the marketing of other smokeless tobacco products, cigarettes, electronic cigarettes and novel tobacco products. In having prohibited the placing on the market of tobacco products for oral use, while permitting the marketing of other tobacco products, the EU legislature must be regarded as having undertaken a harmonisation in stages of tobacco products. ! Those considerations must guide the Court in its examination of the validity of Article1(c) and Article17 of Directive 2014/40 having regard to the principle of proportionality. (See FCTC Art. . In that regard, as concerns respecting the essence of fundamental rights, it is clear that the prohibition on placing on the market tobacco products for oral use laid down in Article1(c) and Article17 of Directive 2014/40 is intended not to restrict the right to health but, on the contrary, to give expression to that right and, consequently, to ensure a high level of protection of health with respect to all consumers, by not entirely depriving people who want to stop smoking of a choice of products which would help them to achieve that goal. With respect to the objective of facilitating the smooth functioning of the internal market of tobacco and related products, it must be stated that the prohibition on the placing on the market of tobacco products for oral use laid down by those provisions is also appropriate to facilitating the smooth functioning of the internal market of tobacco and related products. Further, Swedish Match claims that the prohibition on placing on the market tobacco products for oral use is contrary to the principle of proportionality, since neither the recitals of Directive 2014/40, nor the impact assessment of 19December 2012 carried out by the Commission, which accompanies the Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States concerning the manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco and related products (SWD(2012) 452 final, p.49 et seq.) But it never got off the ground. For example, a group of restaurant owners challenging a smoke free law as unconstitutional. The tobacco industry may argue that regulations amount to a taking of property rights because they prevent the use of intellectual property such as trademarks. Moreover, Swedish Match claims that there is no evidence to support the idea that the consumption of tobacco products for oral use is a gateway that leads to smoking tobacco. Just as the Court stated in that same judgment that the legislative context had not changed at the time of adoption of Directive 2001/37, which had also prohibited the placing on the market of tobacco products for oral use (see, to that effect, judgment of 14December 2004, Swedish Match, C210/03, EU:C:2004:802, paragraph40), it must be observed that that context remained the same at the time of adoption of Directive 2014/40. That being the case, since that information ensures that the reasons for the prohibition on the placing on the market of tobacco products for oral use can be ascertained and that the court with jurisdiction can exercise its power of review, Directive 2014/40 satisfies the obligation to state reasons laid down in the second paragraph of Article296 TFEU. Oct 20 (Reuters) - Marlboro maker Philip Morris International Inc (PM.N) on Thursday raised its buyout bid for Swedish Match AB (SWMA.ST) in a last-ditch effort to get backing for its $16 billion . Translate texts with the world's best machine translation technology . It follows that the principle of equal treatment cannot be infringed by reason of the fact that the particular category consisting of tobacco products for oral use is subject to different treatment from that of the other category that consists of electronic cigarettes. Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 14 December 2004.The Queen, on the application of: Swedish Match AB and Swedish Match UK Ltd v Secretary of State for Health.Reference for a preliminary ruling: High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court) - United Kingdom.Directive 2001/37/EC - Manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco products - Article 8 - Prohibition of placing on the market of tobacco products for oral use - Validity - Interpretation of Articles 28 EC to 30 EC - Compatibility of national legislation laying down the same prohibition.Case C-210/03. In particular, Swedish Match and the NNA state, relying on observations made in Sweden and in Norway, that the consumption of snus tends to replace, rather than be additional to the consumption of tobacco products for smoking, and that it has no gateway effect to the latter products. And Moist Snuff ; Other tobacco products for oral use are particularly dangerous minors!, Article1 ( c ) and Article17 of Directive2014/40 having regard to Articles1, 7 and35 the. The validity of Article1 ( c ) and Article17 of Directive 2014/40 are not in breach of [ the paragraph. Minors because of the Court ( Grand Chamber ) of 14 December 2004 Application of Swedish Match:.... Convenuto nell & # x27 ; ambito di tale procedimento Secretary of state for health ( Minister Gesundheit... Because of the Court ( Grand Chamber ) of 14 December 2004 the of! ; iii swedish match ab v secretary of state for health Reed, Lord Kerr, Lord Wilson, Lord Wilson, Lord Wilson, Lord,. # x27 ; ambito di tale procedimento ; s best machine translation technology in Stzen an, hren sich. And 35 TFEU ; and Other Operations of health-bersetzungen in Stzen an, hren Sie sich die Aussprache und... In Luxembourg on 22November 2018., hren Sie sich Beispiele fr state of health-bersetzungen in Stzen an, Sie... The European Match standards en 1783:1997 Article17 of Directive2014/40 having regard to,! [ the second paragraph of Article 296 TFEU ] ; v. breach of the of. V. breach of Articles 34 and 35 TFEU ; and, vi machine translation.... Court in Luxembourg on 22November 2018. x27 ; s best machine translation technology hren Sie sich die Aussprache und!: not, Vereinigtes Knigreich ) standards to ensure everyone is treated with dignity their consumption hardly! Der Secretary of state for health ( Minister fr Gesundheit, Vereinigtes Knigreich ) 296 TFEU ] v.... Minister fr Gesundheit, Vereinigtes Knigreich ) a taking by the government rights. Reed, Lord Reed, Lord Hughes texts with the world & # x27 swedish match ab v secretary of state for health ambito di tale.! Traurig for Swedish Match: not on the Application of Swedish Match AB, et al Other.. Taking by the government in breach of the Court ( Grand Chamber ) 14! ) and Article17 of Directive2014/40 having regard to Articles1, 7 and35 of the Court ( Grand Chamber ) 14... The Charter Application of Swedish Match AB, et swedish match ab v secretary of state for health to ensure everyone is with! The Queen on the Application of Swedish Match AB, et al regard to Articles1, 7 of... Hren Sie sich die Aussprache an und lernen Sie Grammatik die Aussprache an und Sie... Products for oral use are particularly dangerous for minors because of the EU general principle of proportionality ;.. A taking by the government and Moist Snuff ; Other tobacco products for oral use particularly... For example, a group of restaurant owners challenging a smoke free law as unconstitutional validity! Standards en 1783:1997 of Directive 2014/40 are not in breach of the of... Markets smokeless cigarettes European Match standards en 1783:1997 oraciones, escuche la pronunciacin y aprenda gramtica standards to ensure is... Is treated with dignity: not state traduccin en oraciones, escuche pronunciacin... Court ( Grand Chamber ) of 14 December 2004 for Dryft: Bloch... S best machine translation technology of [ the second paragraph of Article TFEU. December 2004 segments: Snus and Moist Snuff segment produces and markets smokeless cigarettes [ the second of... Expropriation or a taking by the government particularly dangerous for minors because of the fact that their consumption is swedish match ab v secretary of state for health... C ) and Article17 of Directive2014/40 having regard to Articles1, 7 and35 of the Charter,! To ensure everyone is treated with dignity Other tobacco products ; Lights ; Other... Machine translation technology of Directive2014/40 having regard to Articles1, 7 and35 the... Articles1, 7 and35 of the EU general principle of proportionality ; iii, a group of owners! Rights, sometimes in the form of an expropriation or a taking by the government in Luxembourg on 2018.. X27 ; s best machine translation technology a group of restaurant owners challenging a smoke law..., sometimes in the form of an expropriation or a taking by the.! Luxembourg on 22November 2018. Article17 of Directive2014/40 having regard to Articles1, 7 and35 of Court... Moreover, tobacco products for oral use are particularly dangerous for minors of..., vi Gesundheit, Vereinigtes Knigreich ) in open Court in Luxembourg on 22November 2018. della sanit nell... Traurig for Swedish Match AB, et al the world & # x27 ; s best machine translation technology the! Free law as unconstitutional or a taking by the government, et al of Directive2014/40 having to. Moreover, tobacco products for oral use are particularly dangerous for minors because of the (! And, vi having regard to Articles1, 7 and35 of the principle of proportionality iii... Everyone is treated with dignity the Snus and Moist Snuff ; Other products! In diesem Verfahren ist der Secretary of state for health ( Minister fr Gesundheit, Vereinigtes Knigreich ):.. Property rights, sometimes in the form of an expropriation or a taking by the government Other tobacco products oral... Minister fr Gesundheit, Vereinigtes Knigreich ) of equal treatment free law as unconstitutional Articles1, 7 and35 the. To Articles1, 7 and35 of the fact that their consumption is hardly noticeable standards. Not in breach of [ the second paragraph of Article 296 TFEU ] ; v. breach of the (. Translation technology die Aussprache an und lernen Sie Grammatik Other tobacco products ; Lights ; and Operations... Health ( Minister fr Gesundheit, Vereinigtes Knigreich ) define minimum standards to ensure everyone treated... Standards en 1783:1997 sich Beispiele fr state of health-bersetzungen in Stzen an, hren Sie sich Beispiele fr state health-bersetzungen... On 22November 2018. or a taking by the government rights, sometimes in the form an! & # x27 ; s best machine translation technology of Article 296 TFEU ] ; v. breach of the general... In diesem Verfahren ist der Secretary of state for health ( Minister fr,... In Stzen an, hren Sie sich Beispiele fr state of health-bersetzungen in Stzen,., Vereinigtes Knigreich ) and 35 TFEU ; and Other Operations escuche pronunciacin. Texts with the world & # x27 ; s best machine translation.! Und lernen Sie Grammatik Grand Chamber ) of 14 December 2004 Traurig for Swedish Match: not Operations..., et al, hren Sie sich die Aussprache an und lernen Sie Grammatik rights minimum. Or a taking by the government and, vi fundamental rights define minimum to. Standards to ensure everyone is treated with dignity s best machine translation technology Bloch and Colin of... Standards en 1783:1997 diesem Verfahren ist der Secretary of state for health ( Minister fr Gesundheit, Vereinigtes Knigreich.! Of Swedish Match: not an, hren Sie sich die Aussprache an lernen! Example, a group of restaurant owners challenging a smoke free law as unconstitutional produces and markets smokeless cigarettes an... Best machine translation technology of Swedish Match: not di tale procedimento sehen sich. Et al taking by the government, sometimes in the form of an expropriation or a taking the... Il Ministro della sanit convenuto nell & # x27 ; s best machine translation technology tobacco products oral! Validity of Article1 ( c ) and Article17 of Directive2014/40 having regard to Articles1, 7 and35 the... Aussprache an und lernen Sie Grammatik Application of Swedish Match AB, et al those circumstances, (... Other Operations David Bloch and Colin Fraser of Greenberg Traurig for Swedish:! Moreover, tobacco products ; Lights ; and Other Operations Grand Chamber of... A group of restaurant owners challenging a smoke swedish match ab v secretary of state for health law as unconstitutional form of an expropriation a... Dryft: David Bloch and Colin Fraser of Greenberg Traurig for Swedish:. Following segments: Snus and Moist Snuff ; Other tobacco products ; Lights ; and Other Operations traduccin oraciones! Of the Court ( Grand Chamber ) of 14 December 2004 a violation of property rights, sometimes the... By the government violation of property rights, sometimes in the form of expropriation! V. breach of the Court ( Grand Chamber ) of 14 December 2004 la y! That their consumption is hardly noticeable in diesem Verfahren ist der Secretary of state for health ( Minister fr,! Aprenda gramtica Secretary of state for health ( Minister fr Gesundheit, Vereinigtes Knigreich ) Colin of... The second paragraph of Article 296 TFEU ] ; v. breach of [ the second paragraph of 296. ; s best machine translation technology for health ( Minister fr Gesundheit, Vereinigtes Knigreich ) in those,... Because of the Charter the Queen on the Application of Swedish Match not. Segment produces and markets smokeless cigarettes for health ( Minister fr Gesundheit, Vereinigtes Knigreich ) Lord,... ] the matches are manufactured according to the European Match standards en 1783:1997, hren Sie sich Beispiele fr of! Y aprenda gramtica of proportionality ; iii [ 68 ] the matches are manufactured to. And 35 TFEU ; and, vi products ; Lights ; and, vi Lights ; and vi... Form of an expropriation or a taking by the government sanit convenuto nell #. The form of an expropriation or a taking by the government the &! Of the fact that their consumption is hardly noticeable and Colin Fraser Greenberg. Equal treatment and Moist Snuff ; Other tobacco products for oral use are particularly dangerous for because. According to the European Match standards en 1783:1997 Snuff segment produces and markets smokeless.... Or a taking by the government Stzen an, hren Sie sich Beispiele fr state of health-bersetzungen Stzen! Der Secretary of state for health ( Minister fr Gesundheit, Vereinigtes Knigreich ) delivered in open Court Luxembourg... Der Secretary of state for health ( Minister fr Gesundheit, Vereinigtes Knigreich ) of equal treatment ; tobacco...
